Debate: The Nature of Islam

Dr. Zuhdi Jasser vs Dr. Carl Goldberg

Dr Zuhdi Jasser debates Dr Carl Goldberg on the nature of Islam. This debate took place in September, 2014 at a Freedom Fires ( Shane Krauser ) Event.

This debate got into things most folks only dream about. A lot of detail about Islamic books: Quran, etc. This is the Hot topic of the day. And this is a great debate.

Jasser wins THE DEBATE. He won it by using Constitutional principles. Goldberg only preached Sharia Law is not compatible with the US Constitution. He was right,  but lost the debate per the audience.

In my opinion, Goldberg lost the debate because he only dwelled on the incompatibility. He did not present any fresh information.

Sharia Law is still not compatible with US constitution.

The Nature of Islam – Dr. Zuhdi Jasser vs Dr. Carl Goldberg

America’s Problems With Islam

the title should be The World’s Problems with Islam

Muslims, by belief and practice, are the most blatant violators of human rights. We hardly need to detail here Muslims’ systemic cruel treatment of the unbelievers, women of all persuasions, and any and all minorities across the board. To Muslims, human rights have a different meaning, and its protective provisions are reserved strictly for Muslims—primarily for Muslim men. Just a couple of examples should suffice for now.

Oppression of women, for one, is so systemic in Islam that to this day women are, at best, second class citizens under Islamic law. Saudi Arabia, the custodian of Islamdom, denies women the right to drive, vote or hold elective offices—the most basic rights of citizens in democratic societies.

For another, no non-Islamic literature is allowed in Saudi Arabia. A visiting Christian, for instance, is denied to enter the Kingdom with a Bible. Further, severe punishment is meted out to anyone daring to disagree with Islam or espouse a different religion. Iran’s resurgent Shi’ism often vies with Saudi Arabia in its mistreatment of religious and non-religious minorities. To the fanatical ruling gang in Iran, it is their brand of Islam or disenfranchisement of rights of citizenship and even death for the “sin” of apostasy. And of course, there is no point at all in talking about the savage Islamic Taliban.

Respect for the rule of law, as it is understood and practiced by civilized people, is an instrument of convenience to be used to advantage and to be violated when it is not, for the Muslim. A Muslim believes in a different law—the Shariah: a set of stone-age rules. Violation of the non-Muslim laws, therefore, is no violation at all to a Muslim.

Source: News With Views | America’s Problems With Islam

UN Controls USA Borders and Refugee Policies

Little did we know!

Who controls the United States borders and refugees policies? The policies that been in place since LBJ. Strangely, the United Nations.

An agreement that the US government signed in  the 60s under LBJ, very loyal Patriot that helped murder President Kennedy.

This is shocking, the UN controls our borders. There was a 1951 Refugee Convention that ended up in what we call 1967 protocols and we became a signatory in 1968. The Refugee Convention came up with legal codes that we were bound to follow because of our signatures. Of course, we could get out of this at any time. Why Trump hasn’t, I don’t know.

I’ll tell you until Trump gets rid of these regulations, I wouldn’t want to spend one tax dollar on building a wall. Because it won’t mean a damn thing.

What does this Include

  • article 3 precludes a Muslim travel ban.
  • article 16 mandates free legal aid for Refugees. We get to pay for these guys when they show up at our door and demand to come.
  • In article 17 requires a refugee to work.
  • article 22 mandates free education.
  • article 23 free welfare.
  • article 24 free health care.
  • It goes on article 26 they can travel anywhere in the United States.
  • article 28 you can leave the United States and return unabated
  • articles 32 and 33 make deportation almost impossible.
  • In article 31 prohibits imposing penalties on account of their illegal entry
    or presence on refugees

The UN Controls USA Borders and Refugee Policies.

Cutting to the Chase in the Arpaio Trial

Richard Mack, Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Chairman: “Does a federal judge have any authority or jurisdiction to control an elected official in our state or any other state? The answer is an unambiguous NO! In my landmark case SCOTUS said that the states are not subject to “federal direction.” Thus, federal judges being federal cannot direct state officials The complaint filed against Joe had no business being in federal court.

If Joe had done this very minor offense he was accused of, it did not qualify as a federal case. The Judges did not understand who elected officials answer to and believed far too much in their own importance and power. The judges in Arpaio’s case should have declined to hear it. Furthermore, his attorneys never challenged jurisdiction until it was way too late. Again, federal judges cannot tell sheriffs how to do their jobs.

Coincidentally, I have been through a federal checkpoint on I-10 outside El Paso, where all motorists are stopped, detained, and asked if they are citizens of the USA. Did Joe really do anything differently? I would submit that the border checkpoints (not at the border) are more intrusive than anything Arpaio ever dreamed of doing. Could you imagine what would have happened to him if he had set up checkpoints asking all citizens to prove their citizenship!?!?

Most importantly, federal judges across this country are committing the most egregious crimes imaginable. They sentence innocent people to prison, they deny bail to numerous arrestees and then deny speedy trials. Juries are manipulated and exculpatory evidence for defendants is thrown out. Witnesses for the defense are threatened and intimidated, and the trials are extremely one sided. In Arpaio’s case, the judge denied him a jury trial.

Read the Sixth Amendment, it says in all criminal prosecutions, did you catch that word? ALL criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy a speedy and public trial with an impartial jury! So I ask; who broke the law here, Arpaio or the judges? These judges are the worst criminals; they destroy families, imprison innocents, and trample America’s Foundation. They put federal bureaucracies ahead of the Constitution, the Pursuit of Happiness, and personal liberty. I blame them, not Arpaio! America is in peril and it is precisely the result of federal bureaucracies and federal judges!”

Islam: An Enemy Within

I have repeatedly said in the past that being a Muslim and being American are incompatible. A Muslim is an Ummah-ist. His/her loyalty, first and above all, is to Islamic world rule and not to the country where he/she resides. By allowing Muslims to immigrate to the West, we are literary inviting the biggest enemy of mankind into our homes. Because, Muslims do not assimilate, they come here to make Islam the law of the land. ………… Muslim organizations in America, generously financed by the oil-rich Muslim government and sheikhs, are directed to sell Islam Lite for long enough until the cult runs deep roots and Real Islam is introduced. One can see how the scheme played out in Europe. Much of Europe is already past the stage of Islam Lite and knee deep into the quagmire of Real Islam. And that’s exactly where things are headed in America.

Read the entire article here: Linda Sarsour: An Enemy Within

Read more about Women as property – Islam’s Onslaught of America: Women As Property


Before the following discussion, please be reminded of what Valerie Jarrett, President Obama’s chief advisor stated in 1977 at Stanford University: “I am an Iranian by birth and of my Islamic faith. I am also an American citizen and I seek to help change America to be a more Islamic country. My faith guides me and I feel like it is going well in the transition of using freedom of religion in America against itself.”

The Supreme Law of the Land of the United States is, the 1787 Constitution of the United States for the United States of America. Islamic Sharia Law is the law of the land in several countries around the World.

Before any discussion about religious ideology can take place, there first needs to be a POLITICAL discussion, regarding the “law of the land.”

To put the problem in its proper perspective, one needs to consider the POLITICAL aspects of Islam and its Sharia Law, as Sharia Law is the POLITICAL arm of the Islamic religion, and the only way Sharia Law has any force whatsoever, is by being the law of the land, otherwise people will reject Sharia Law overwhelmingly.

The end of Sharia Law is just around the corner and the educated Islamic faithful know it, while the uneducated blind followers do not have a clue, because, about 1300 years ago, Islam leadership made a fundamental change in its reasoning, when Islam reversed itself from, reasoning controlling the Koran, to the Koran controlling reasoning. With that in mind, now one can see where the intolerance of Islam in relation to other belief systems of whatever flavor, comes from.

The problem with Islam and Sharia Law is, the Islamic religion adherents want to use the United States Constitutional guarantee of Freedom of Religion to support their alleged right to promote by force and coercion, under color of that Constitutional Religious Freedom, Sharia Law as the law of the land for the United States, over the objection and without the consent of the “people of the United States,” thereby replacing the 1787 Constitution of the United States for the United States of America, as the Supreme Law of the Land for the United States. This action causes a TREASON to the 1787 Constitution of the United States for the United States of America, under the accepted definition of TREASON, “a change of

Read more here ISLAM and SHARIA LAW in the UNITED STATES

Islam’s Onslaught of America: To Seed Host Countries To Gain Numbers

This is how Islam gets a hold in countries. It is like eating and elephant; “Just one bite at a time.”
“When the Muslim population remains at or under 2%, their presence tends to fly low under the radar. In the 2% – 5% range, Muslims begin to seek converts, targeting those they see as disaffected, such as criminals. When the population reaches 5% they exert influence disproportionate to their numbers, becoming more aggressive and pushing for Sharia law. When the population hits the 10% mark, Muslims become increasingly lawless and violent. Once the population reaches 20%, there is an increase in rioting, murder, jihad militias, and destruction of non-Muslim places of worship. At 40%, there are “widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare.” Once beyond 50%, infidels and apostates are persecuted, genocide occurs, and Sharia law is implemented. After 80%, intimidation is a daily part of life along with violent jihad and some state-run genocide as the nation purges all infidels. Once the nation has rid itself of all non-Muslims, the presumption is that ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ has been attained – the Islamic House of Peace.”

Read the entire article here: Islam’s Onslaught of America: To Seed Host Countries To Gain Numbers/

The So Called “Racial Divide” Examined

As We the People continue to advance forward in our objective to help heal this, what Abraham Lincoln described as “a house divided against itself” Union republic, USA, the following must be considered and understood:

This “house divided” is not the so called “racial divide” between white and black US citizens, which in my understanding is a distracting misnomer

1. The “house” is between those whom are its architectural owners, and not their chattel slaves, whom have no property ownership, but rather are considered as such, had no say in the masters’ argument on government rule, even though they may have private sentiments in the matter.
a. The property owners happen to be white-Caucasians of the British Isles and European Europe, of willing immigration descent.

b. These particular white people have hated and warred against each other over the matter of black lives since 1776. Hence, the divide is between white people and white people, not white and black peoples! The racial issue is a symptom of white peoples’ divide.

c. Blacks not in sight, white British Isle-Europeans have always been at empire-building wars with themselves, which is why they exploited the peoples and ravaged the natural resources of other continents. Hence, the Triangular Transatlantic Slave Trade!

d. The immigrants brought their arguing attitudes with them, effecting African descent blacks, whose bitter sentiments towards each other ignited and exploded into the Civil War of 1861-1865 over the matter of lives in chattel slavery.

e. The white founding fathers argued so intensely over the matter, that the new nation “conceived in liberty” and “dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal”, was almost aborted, settling on a compromise for which 740,000 young, innocent white boys and men, plus 38,000 blacks of such, paid with unwarranted suffering and death.
2. As did and does arguing, white Europeans, black Africans also have always argued, competed and waged war against themselves as well, without even the slightest knowledge of white peoples’ existence.
a. African slave trade blacks had never seen white people until their black and Muslim masters brought them shackled in chains to the various west coast ports of Africa to be sold to them.

b. The enslaved Africans were/are a multi-ethnic and tribal, national-mixed population forced into unity by the chains of slavery.

c. African slaves entered America a naturally divided and competing peoples.

d. Yet, while having understandable fear of the crazy, white slave merchants and sailors, who received “legal” jurisdiction over their lives by purchase from their former black and Muslim masters, nonetheless, the slaves were raging mad at each other for selling another to the white Europeans, Americans, Jews and Christians.

e. Herein lays the answer to the mystery as to why black US citizens can’t unify in just, common causes, because our restless ancestors are still raging at war with each other inside of us today, even as such is true within those of white European descent.
3. Both sets of US citizens are troubled today by their respective ancestral conflicts and grudges inside of them.
4. The two separate “ports of entry” into this nation for Africans and Europeans are vastly different, figuratively;
A. One, being the Mayflower, i.e., willing legal and illegal immigrants;
B. The other, slaves ships (White Lion and Treasure). African slaves were purchased in Africa from black and Muslim merchants and brought against their will to the Americas to serve immigrants.

Summary of USA’s Immigration Law – Public Law 414

ISLAM WAS BANNED FROM THE USA IN 1952, but Establishment doesn’t want you to know that nor do they respect or uphold US law. The Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27,1952 revised the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States.

That act, which became Public Law 414. established both the law and the intent to Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today. Among the many issues it covers, one in particular, found in Chapter 2 Section 212(27)(F). is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by “force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.”

This, by its very definition, rules out Islamic immigration to the United States, but this law is being ignored by the White House. Islamic immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the US government, the Constitution, and to the Republic.

All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life’s guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government. Now the political correct crowd would say that Islamist persons cannot be prohibited from entering the US because Islam is a religion. Whether it is a religion is immaterial because the law stales that Aliens who are affiliated with any “organization” that advocates the overthrow of our government are prohibited.

All this is just Comment Sense! A person does not shoot them selves in a foot on purpose.

Read it for yourself – The Immigration and Nationality Act.

Read more here ISLAM and SHARIA LAW in the UNITED STATES

HISTORY: Trump’s Muslim Ban Wasn’t the First… Look What America Did in 1907

Reptilian Conquest

According to researcher Len Kasten, an alien race known as the Reptilians have been abducting humans and creating hybrids as part of a conflict that has been going on for “many, many millennia.” Joining Richard Syrett, he discussed how these techniques have been the hallmark of Reptilian conquest throughout the galaxy. His sources indicate that humans originated from the constellation known as Lyra. He described how a reptilian race from the Draco system invaded and chased the humans from their home star system to 110 other planets in the galaxy, which he says is known as “The Federation.” Two of these planets are in our solar system: Mars and what is now known as Earth. Kasten says that the Reptilian race pursued humans to these two planets and sent the Martians underground, and invaded Earth, where they still live to this day, controlling our civilization and abducting some humans for horrific experiments and others for food.

Kasten says a few thousand members of the Reptilian race live underground and control our lives though the Illuminati, who are part Reptilian and own the banking and other economic instruments that run world societies. He says “wherever they go, they create a central bank” and money system as a method of power. He thinks they also keep humans subjugated by “keeping us in a state of ignorance” about our true abilities. He also believes that the Reptilians prefer the blood of children because Kasten says it is “unpolluted” and because of this, abduct them in the thousands every year. He doubts David Icke’s contention that Queen Elizabeth is a shape-shifting Reptilian, although adding that usually he “would tend to believe him before I would disbelieve him.”

Both the Nazis and the Imperial Japanese Government were controlled by the Reptilians during WWII according to Kasten, but Hitler was eventually abandoned because he “became crazy and they could no longer control him.” After the war, he contends that Dwight Eisenhower was briefed on the full Reptilian scenario, but that since then the fabled group known as MJ-12 are the only ones that continue to know all the facts. He added that alien/human hybrids live among us in society and are attempting to infiltrate our civilization by steady degrees. Kasten finally remarked that “actually, the Reptilians are afraid of us” and that the only chance to prevail in this scenario is to make more people aware of the situation.

Thanks to Coast to Coast