The word Democracy gives you a warm fuzzy feeling that everything is all right. You couldn't be more wrong! It is the steppingstone to communism!
Why A Replubic
Basic Political Spectrum
+The Lefts Last Stand
+Present Day Strategies
How They Did It
- Operation Mockingbird
- AM Radio vs TV
- War On Drugs
- Brain Washing
- ISLAM Sharia
- Being PC
- Redefined Words
- Destroyed Family
- Moral Equivalence
- Music and Language
- The Shock Doctrine
- Neo Conservative
- Private Prison Industry
- The Progressive Era
- Agenda 21
- Cultural Marxism
How They Did It - ISLAM Sharia - Show Print View!
First, Sharia's Main Conflict with our Culture
The other religions don't have laws with them like Islam does. Islam has Sharia law with it, which is a government system.
The next phase we see is they begin to resist authorities and customs. With that we see a rise of crimes that are allowed under Sharia law. The most common is what is called ‘honor killings’. Under Sharia lawa woman is nothing more than a piece of property that the husband can do anything with whenever he wants, and the ‘wife’ has no right to object. In New Jersey a Muslim man raped his wife and she filed charges. Keep in mind, in America a husband cannot rape his wife. The woman cannot be forced against her will but under Sharia law, a woman has no choice. She cannot refuse.
Liberals running interference for Islam while bashing Christianity and Judiasm, can see the results of their Sharia friendly liberal judge activism in the New Jersey case of “S.D. v. M.J.R. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.)” In this recent case, a judge declared Rape acceptable because of Muslim cultural traditions.
The Quran gives husbands supreme authority over a woman.
Read the entire article here: Destroying America From Within, Part 4
Dr. Zuhdi Jasser vs Dr. Carl Goldberg a debate
Dr Zuhdi Jasser debates Dr Carl Goldberg on the nature of Islam. This debate took place in September, 2014 at a Freedom Fires - was a Shane Krauser Event.
This debate got into things most folks only dream about. A lot of detail about Islamic books: Quran, etc. This is the Hot topic of the day. And this is a great debate.
Jasser wins THE DEBATE. He won it by using Constitutional principles. Goldberg only preached Sharia Law is not compatible with the US Constitution. He was right, but lost the debate per the audience.
In my opinion, Goldberg lost the debate because he only dwelled on the incompatibility. He did not present any fresh information.
Sharia Law is still not compatible with US constitution.
The Nature of Islam - Dr. Zuhdi Jasser vs Dr. Carl Goldberg
Details of how Sharia is in conflict with our Constitution
These distinctive terms are all Biblical terms that convey theological principles and doctrines of the Christian faith. Each of these distinctive terms houses a theology that when unpacked creates the full and proper context of the founding documents. In essence, the Declaration of Independence conveys a Biblical Christian theology.
Couple those distinctive terms to the distinctive terms in the Prologue of the Constitution and one can see the full theological relationship that the United States of America has with this Sovereign Creator, Sovereign God, and Supreme Judge who rules and governs with Divine Providence: "WE THE PEOPLE of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, Provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America".
This theological relationship is structured like all biblical relationships with God in the form of a covenant. In general, a covenant is a theological agreement the nation made with God and represents its relationship to God and vice-versa. The covenant agrees to follow the Divine Laws of God (covenant stipulations) via obedience and submission to God, and to worship God as the only God, the Sovereign Creator of heaven and earth, the Most High King! Our sworn commitment to be obedient to the stipulations is what leads to and justifies the phrase, "for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of [His] Divine Providence" in the Declaration of Independence. This commitment and “firm reliance" is carried over into the Constitution by the pledge phrase, "and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
The First Amendment does NOT give islamists the right to build mosques, proselytize, and institute sharia here!
What this relationship agrees to is that WE THE PEOPLE agree to be God's people by being obedient and in submission to Him and His Word, and that WE THE PEOPLE believe, based on God’s promises and God, that God agrees to be our God and Bless us with His Divine Providence, Promises, and the Blessings of Liberty which are tied to the freedom to exercise our unalienable rights in accordance to His Word and Laws.
To keep WE THE PEOPLE of the United States of America safe, both physically and spiritually (theologically), the President of the United States of America must then keep these stipulations and the conditions of the covenant. Therefore, the leadership premise that WE THE PEOPLE of the United States of America should not ban Islam, but instead evaluate the ideology of Islam based on the duplicity of conduct of its people is false, and raises the issue of Treason, Sedition, and Idolatry being propagated as a national security policy. To substantiate this proposition one only needs to examine the doctrines of Islam and compare them to the doctrines of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. We do not establish the legitimacy of our national security based on evaluating someone’s conduct, but their worldview or ideology in relation to ours.
When the doctrines of Islam are evaluated in contrast to the doctrines of Christianity, which under gird our founding documents, we find that the doctrines of Islam are doctrines of Declarations of War against EVERY theological term and principle that forms the explicit identity of WE THE PEOPLE of the United States of America and the United States of America as a nation. Islam is a religious and political Declaration of War against WE THE PEOPLE of the United States of America and the United States of America as a nation! Islamic doctrines proclaim: no other God, but Allah; jihad (Holy War) against "all" non-Muslims; paradise or salvation for its believers only obtained via jihad; Taqiyya, intentional deception of being "at peace" with other religions or "being a religion of peace" which is to be used on all non-Muslims; that Islam's declared enemies are Christians and Jews, which must be utterly eliminated via murder; and that Sharia, Islam's divine laws, are to be strictly enforced on all people.
Given the doctrines of Islam, the conduct of terrorists is sanctioned by Islam as is the conduct of those claiming to be peaceful to non-Muslims for the purpose of deception. To rely on the claim that Islam is a religion of peace is to place National Security and the safety of We The People in the hands of Islam instead of the hands of the Sovereign God who promises His Divine Protection provided We The People are faithful and loyal to Him. To default to trusting Allah’s word is to betray the God of the Covenant. This betrayal is Idolatry. In addition, to be a Muslim one must believe in Islam, jihad, and its Divine Laws of conduct per Sharia. You cannot separate Sharia and jihad from Islam and claim to be Islamic or Muslim. Therefore, it is not the conduct that is the standard for evaluation of Islam, it is its doctrines, and its doctrines oppose the doctrines that form our Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. To permit Islam in the USA is an act of Treason since the doctrines of Islam declare the destruction of Christianity and the overthrow of the government that supports it.
Read the entire article by George J.Galatis .
How They Did It - ISLAM Sharia Show Print View!
Help me promote this website!